Exclusion of evidence from a narcotics case

While represented by another law firm, our client was charged and found guilty by default for possession of unstamped tobacco, resulting in fines of over $200,000. She had also tried to submit a request for revocation of judgment to overturn this decision, without success.Our firm was mandated when our client wanted to appeal the decision refusing her the revocation of the default judgment rendered against her. The appeal of the revocation of judgment, before the Superior Court, was granted and the case was returned to the Court of Quebec, so that the client could stand trial there. However, following negotiations, the prosecutors of Revenu Québec, which acted as prosecutor in the file, withdrew the charges against our client, resulting in her acquittal.Me Anne-Marie Campeau ensured the principal representation of the client before the Superior Court and before the Court of Quebec.

In 2016, our client was found guilty of first degree murder in a case dating back to the late 1980s. At the appeal stage, our client retained our firm, which was successful in obtaining an order for retrial at the Quebec Court of Appeal. Me maxime raymond ensured the principal representation of the client before the court of appeal of quebec.

At his first trial, our client was charged and later found guilty of first degree murder in a case dating back to the late 1980s. Our firm obtained an order for a new trial before the Quebec Court of Appeal. . In preparation for the second trial, the defense made several preliminary motions, and succeeded in having the client's confessions taken during a "mister big" operation excluded. The prosecution later offered the client to enter a guilty plea to a reduced offense of manslaughter. Due to time spent in pre-trial detention, the client was released from jail the same day the client's confession was ruled out, after entering a guilty plea to a reduced count of manslaughter. Me anne-marie campeau ensured the principal representation of the client before the superior court.

Me Maxime Raymond represented the interests of the Quebec Association of Lawyers and Defense Lawyers (Aqaad) before the Supreme Court of Canada in the Sharma case. This case dealt with the availability of conditional sentencing (house imprisonment) for certain criminal offenses and the constitutionality of certain provisions of the criminal code. Mr. Raymond's representations on behalf of the aqaad were aimed at increasing the number of offenses where a conditional sentence is an available sentence.